標題: 轉貼：疑似外星文明的遺跡。∼＊ [打印本頁]
作者:
夢想幻滅 時間: 2008-11-3 11:30 PM 標題: 轉貼：疑似外星文明的遺跡。∼＊
轉貼：疑似外星文明的遺跡。∼＊ 
1、位於英格蘭威爾特郡索爾茲伯里平原的巨石陣，又稱環狀列石、太陽神廟等名，是歐洲著名的文化神廟遺址。據推測約出現於公元前4000-2000年，有學者認為是史前文明遺址，也有人認為是外星文明的痕跡。這個巨大的石建築群位於一個空曠的原野上，佔地大約11公頃，主要是由許多整塊的藍砂岩組成，每塊約重50噸。幾個世紀以來，沒有人知道的真正用途，也沒有人知道是誰建造了巨石陣，而古老的傳說和人們的種種推測，讓巨石陣更增加了神秘的氛圍。
2、中國阿爾泰山荒原通天石人之謎，被疑為人類對外星文明的記錄。矗立在草原上的石人成為一種神秘主義的象徵。
3、復活節島石雕，這一著名的世界文化之謎，古往今來吸引了多少探險者。然而，這些石雕像的價值還不是最主要的，在那堅硬、貧瘠的地層深處，還隱藏著令人吃驚的秘密。在復活節島的秘密洞穴裡，任何一件石雕品，都足以使人目瞪口呆：一個露著牙，斜著眼，張大嘴巴狂吠的狗頭；兩隻正在交配的海龜；一隻栩栩如生的太平洋刺龍蝦，蝦腿自然蜷縮著，觸鬚平平舒展在蝦背上；還有用石頭刻成的複活節島特有的小船模型。表現各種怪異動物的雕像也不少，如島人、蛇人及許多不可名狀的怪物，具有何等神秘和奇特的想像力。有一位男人的石雕像，叉開雙腿，高舉兩隻胳膊，高高地站在其他雕像之上。
4、古埃及金字塔在沒有先進的科技支撐，單靠一些原始工具及人力，竟可建成如此宏偉的建築？現今最先進科技也未能做到，那古代埃及人到底是怎樣建造？另外，金字塔的神秘至今仍是一個謎，不少學者認為金字塔是古代外星人留下的建築物。
5、20億年前的神秘核反應堆。 20億年前，十幾座天然核反應堆神秘啟動，穩定地輸出能量，並安全運轉了幾十萬年之久。為什麼它們沒有在爆炸中自我摧毀？是誰保證了這些核反應的安全運行？莫非它們真的如世間的傳言那樣，是外星人造訪的證據，或者是上一代文明的傑作？
6、瑪雅文明似乎是從天而降，在最為輝煌繁盛之時，又戛然而止。在瑪雅人的編年史中，曾記載了地球9000萬年至4億年之間的事。要知道，人類在數百萬年前才告別了古猿，幾億年前地球上根本沒有人類，瑪雅人記載了誰的歷史？有些學者提出大膽的看法：在遙遠的古代，美州熱帶叢林中可能來過一批具有高度文明的外星智能生命，他們走出飛船，教給了尚在原始時代的瑪雅人各種先進知識，然後又飄然而去。他們被瑪雅人視為是天神。瑪雅文化中那些令人難以理解的高深知識，就是出於外星人的傳授。帕倫克石板上的雕刻，也是瑪雅人對外星宇航員的臨摹。外星人離去時，曾向瑪雅人許諾重返地球，但在瑪雅人的追求祭司預言天神返回的日子裡，這些外星並未重新返回。於是這導致了瑪雅人對其宗教和祭司統治的信心喪失，進而引起了整個民族心理的崩潰，終於使人們一個個離開故鄉，各自走散。瑪雅文化就這樣消失了。
7、神秘莫測的印加帝國失落之城，它是沒有語言的印加文明留給世界的一個沉默證據。因建在峭壁上，又叫空中花園。
8、巴別通天塔。巴比倫是一座令人神往的古城，它位於幼發拉底河和底格里斯河的交匯處。早在公元前１８３０年左右，阿摩利人就以巴比倫為都城，建立了古巴比倫王國。歷經了５００多年戰亂，直到公元前７世紀末，才在尼布甲尼撒領導下，建立了新巴比倫王國。然而，８８年後，新巴比倫王國又被波斯人徹底毀滅。隨著巴比倫王朝的覆滅，顯赫一時的古城巴比倫，也日漸消失在荒草之中了。《聖經.舊約》上說，人類的祖先最初講的是同一種語言。他們在底格里斯河和幼發拉底河之間，發現了一塊非常肥沃的土地，於是就在那裡定居下來，修起了城池。後來，他們的日子越過越好，決定修建一座可以通到天上去的高塔，這就是巴別塔。他們用磚和河泥做為建築的材料。直到有一天，高高的塔頂已衝入雲霄。上帝耶和華得知此事又驚又怒，認為這是人類虛榮心的象徵。上帝心想，人們講同樣的語言，就能建起這樣的巨塔，日後還有什麼辦不成的事情呢？於是上帝決定讓人世間的語言發生混亂。後來人們就把巴比倫叫做"冒犯上帝的城市"。
9、蒂亞瓦納科太陽門依舊是一個無法破譯的巨大謎團。
10、中國青海德令哈白公山下，遍布了已經鏽蝕嚴重、風化良久的鐵質管狀物究竟是何來源？它究竟包容了什麼樣的秘密呢？是化石還是外星文明的遺物？至今眾說紛紜。在人跡罕至的山谷裡，遠古的遺跡被風雨改變著舊有的模樣。
作者:
特種偵察士兵 時間: 2008-11-3 11:34 PM
現在啲人是但一樣野就話是外星人做的
作者:
`乜名. 時間: 2008-11-3 11:36 PM
大自然係藝術家~
作者:
夢想幻滅 時間: 2008-11-3 11:36 PM 標題: 回覆 #2 特種偵察士兵 的帖子
馬雅係最多人認為係外星文明，其他呢.............唔知
作者:
特種偵察士兵 時間: 2008-11-3 11:38 PM
有待考證啊!
作者:
夢想幻滅 時間: 2008-11-3 11:39 PM 標題: 回覆 #5 特種偵察士兵 的帖子
最好快d考證完，好想知結果
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-5 06:05 PM
原帖由 夢想幻滅 於 2008-11-3 11:36 PM 發表。 
馬雅係最多人認為係外星文明，其他呢.............唔知
同埋埃及都係.....
作者:
夢想幻滅 時間: 2008-11-5 07:08 PM 標題: 回覆 #7 新齡 的帖子
金字塔好勁，究竟點起既呢.................
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-6 06:39 PM
原帖由 夢想幻滅 於 2008-11-5 07:08 PM 發表。
金字塔好勁，究竟點起既呢.................
獅身人勁d,唔係幾何圖形,唔係砌成
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-14 04:51 AM
贈你兩個字：荒謬！
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-14 12:52 PM
又說你一句：naive!
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-16 03:25 AM
There are no scientific evidence to proof that aliens were involved in any of the issues above, therefore, we can't assume that they have relation with outer space technology. We, too, can't assume the human in the past can't built such things.
夠薑就用英文答
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-16 09:29 AM
smarty kid (聰明仔)
I have enough ginger to answer your question 
have I said that human in the past can't built such things???
in Scientific step
observes carefully--Proposes the supposition--Carries on the experiment--Measures the solid record--Analytical data
relation with outer space technology is just people's deem
deem can't limit by any scientific
don't be smarty kid(咪做聰明仔la)
作者:
kelvinNg 時間: 2008-11-16 05:07 PM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-16 09:29 AM 發表。
smarty kid (聰明仔)
I have enough ginger to answer your question
have I said that human in the past can't built such things???
in Scientific step
observes carefully--Pro ...
totally adore
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-17 04:56 PM
原帖由 kelvinNg 於 2008-11-16 05:07 PM 發表。
totally adore
Thanks for support!(多謝支持!)
XDXD!!
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-22 05:15 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-16 09:29 AM 發表。
have I said that human in the past can't built such things???
I don't remember saying "You think that human in the past can't built such things?"
All I mean is that we should dicuss this issue objectively.
By the way, some of the references in this post are unproven and untrue
And also, the word "deem" is used as a verb, not a noun.
[ 本帖最後由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-22 05:18 AM 編輯 ]
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-22 09:16 AM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-22 05:15 AM 發表。
I don't remember saying "You think that human in the past can't built such things?"
You say "I don't remember saying "You think that human in the past can't built such things?" "
Then,what is??
you are slapping your own face
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-16 03:25 AM 發表。
We can't assume the human in the past can't built such things.
I also by the way,assume is not equal to deem doesn't need to prove and check true or not
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-23 11:54 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-22 09:16 AM 發表。
You say "I don't remember saying "You think that human in the past can't built such things?" "
Then,what is??
you are slapping your own face
I said "We" can not assume
Did I specifically state that "You" are assuming?
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-22 09:16 AM 發表。
I also by the way,assume is not equal to deem doesn't need to prove and check true or not
This sentence has a very serious gammatical error
Ask your teacher to correct it, and tell him/her to teach you how to write a sentence in a correct grammatical structure
Also, you still havn't answer me why did you use the word "deem" as a noun instead of a verb
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-23 04:33 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-23 11:54 AM 發表。
I said "We" can not assume
Did I specifically state that "You" are assuming?
In that you hadn't specifically state that "I" am assuming?
Then,you said "We can not assume"for what????
Are you want to undraw the talking-point???
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-23 11:54 AM 發表。
This sentence has a very serious
gammatical error
Ask your teacher to correct it, and tell him/her to teach you how to write a sentence in a correct gammatical structure
Also, you still havn't answer me why did you use the word "deem" as a noun instead of a verb
These sentences are nothing to do with this topic,is grammatical concern with this topic??,are you want to undraw the talking-point again???
Also,in orthodoxy english,it should be grammatical and not gammatical
I remind you to correct your "gammatical error" before you point out my grammatical
problem
smarty ginger kid
[ 本帖最後由 新齡 於 2008-11-24 01:42 AM 編輯 ]
作者:
話說從前 時間: 2008-11-23 04:41 PM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-23 04:33 PM 發表。
In that you hadn't specifically state that "I" am assuming?
Then,you said "We can not assume"for what????
Are you want to undraw the talking-point???
These ...
你地好無聊呀
作者:
`乜料 時間: 2008-11-23 04:42 PM 標題: 回覆 #20 話說從前 的帖子
英文王決戰x_x
作者:
話說從前 時間: 2008-11-23 04:48 PM
原帖由 `乜料 於 2008-11-23 04:42 PM 發表。
英文王決戰x_x
嗯
太有才了...
作者:
kris72730 時間: 2008-11-23 05:03 PM
agree,it is so boring
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-25 05:42 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-23 04:33 PM 發表。
Also,in orthodoxy english,it should be grammatical and not gammatical
I remind you to correct your "gammatical error" before you point out my grammatical
problem
smarty ginger kid
Does it really matter if I spelled one letter wrong if you know what I'm trying to express
The matter is, I don't understand what are you trying to tell me in that sentence.
Therefore, the grammatical error in your sentence is extremely serious compare to my tiny error
Or is it that you don't want to admit you have done something wrong
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-25 05:44 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-25 05:42 AM 發表。
the grammatical error in your sentence is extremely serious compare to my tiny error
So what??
Could it be said that a tiny error isn't a error??
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-25 05:42 AM 發表。
You don't understand what am I trying to tell you in that sentence.
You don't understand what am I trying to tell you in that sentence is mean your intellect is too low or lower than normal people
From this to finally I also feel you are undrawing the talking-point.
smarty kid still are smarty kid
[ 本帖最後由 新齡 於 2008-11-25 05:45 PM 編輯 ]
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-26 05:54 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-25 05:44 PM 發表。
You don't understand what am I trying to tell you in that sentence is mean your intellect is too low or lower than normal people
Indeed, you haven't noticed the problem in your sentence
This is not a matter of intellegence, but the usage of the English language
If you're to lazy to correct your sentence, I will point out the error in your sentence so you can try to use your unsophisticated brain to correct it.
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-22 09:16 AM 發表。
I also by the way,assume is not equal to deem doesn't need to prove and check true or not
I also by the way : What do you mean by "I" ? "Also" should be used on it's own, as well as "by the way"
assume is not equal to deem : Verb tense error and confusion between noun and verb
dosen't need to prove and check ture or not : Something is missing in between "to" and "prove", as well as "check" and "ture". Spelling mistake in "ture"
This is somewhat about the how the word "assume" and "deem" is not equal, but I was asking you about why you have used "deem" as a verb instead of a noun, which you still haven't answer.
It is obvious that you are trying to avoid this question because you know it's wrong
The more aggresive you reply, the more obvious that you are trying to hide the truth, which means you're more afraid to face the truth. 
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-26 01:32 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-26 05:54 AM 發表。
Indeed, you haven't noticed the problem in your sentence
This is not a matter of intellegence, but the usage of the English language
If you're to lazy to correct your sentence, I will p ...
From this to finally,so many you said also are trying to undrawing the talking-point.
Such naive cheap trick.Will I be deceivd??
Smarty Kid
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-27 05:30 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-23 04:33 PM 發表。
In that you hadn't specifically state that "I" am assuming?
Then,you said "We can not assume"for what????
\
"We" dosen't mean "You"
In fact, "We" does not necessarily means anyone or everyone
It's based on the user's will, and you assume that I'm talking about you
I am not afraid to answer what you require me to, however, you are
It's your turn to admit your gammtical error
If you don't admit your error, then you're admitting you're a coward indirectly
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-27 07:25 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-27 05:30 AM 發表。
I am not afraid to answer what you require me to
You are not afraid,you are scared,
If not,why don't you answer,and just said "I am not afraid to answer what you require me to"
Why you don't quote yesterday's new post and quote a post before three days
and said many and many excuse and undraw the talking-point again and again
It means you have nothing to say in reply
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-28 04:41 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-27 07:25 PM 發表。
If not,why don't you answer,and just said "I am not afraid to answer what you require me to"
Why you don't quote yesterday's new post and quote a post before three days
and said many and many excuse and undraw the talking-point again and again
It means you have nothing to say in reply
You said I was scared to reply the post at 2008-11-26, but I was actually replying it.
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-26 01:32 PM 發表。
From this to finally,so many you said also are trying to undrawing the talking-point.
You only said I was undrawing the talking point.
So I draw back the talking point by replying the most recent post which I didn't reply
But you didn't get it, and said I was too scared to answer
Doesn't that show that you are unsophisticated as you don't even know what is going on?
Furthermore, you still haven't admit that you had a serious grammatical error
Which means you admit that you are a coward indirectly
I think you should go back to grade 1, seriously
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-28 06:07 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-28 04:41 AM 發表。
You said I was scared to reply the post at 2008-11-26, but I was actually replying it.
You "said" replying it actually but you hadn't replying it actually
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-28 04:41 AM 發表。
You only said I was undrawing the talking point.
But in fact,you had undrawing the talking point again and again and again
All day say about grammatical error
Is it possible that you haven't got any better sophistry????
How can you point out otherone's grammatical error while you haven't admit your "gammatical error"
Full mouth justice's hypocrite
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-29 05:35 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-28 06:07 PM 發表。
You "said" replying it actually but you hadn't replying it actually
But in fact,you had undrawing the talking point again and again and again
How am I undrawing the talking point?
I draw back the talking point as you wish
You are the one who was undrawing the talking point
You havn't reply anything about the main point in the post I posted at 2008-11-27
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-28 06:07 PM 發表。
All day say about grammatical error
How can you point out otherone's grammatical error while you haven't admit your "gammatical error"
Full mouth justice's hypocrite
First of all, spelling error does not consider a grammar error
According to the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, grammar means the study of the way the sentences of a language are constructed; morphology and syntax.
Spelling a word correctly is not consider as the syntax of a sentence
Second, I did admit I made that grammer mistake, didn't you read my post ?
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-25 05:42 AM 發表。
Does it really matter if I spelled one letter wrong if you know what I'm trying to express
I said it dosen't really matter, but I did say I spelled one letter wrong
Also, correcting your error doesn't make me a hypocrite, or else all of your teacher would become a hypocrite
Plus, a teacher would make errors too
However, you made at least one error in every post
You don't even qualify to use the English language for you made error so "fluently"
Finally, you should get rid of the funny faces you got there
It's fine to use one or two to express your feeling
But since you put that much faces in your post, it shows that you have nothing to say and are trying to fill up the spaces.
They meant nothing but a bunch of pixels
I don't felt humiliated by those pixels, but rather annoyed
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-29 08:18 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-29 05:35 AM 發表。
You havn't reply anything about the main point in the post I posted at 2008-11-27
Then what is the post I posted at 2008-11-27
If your understanding ability is really so low,I propose you to consult a doctor
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-29 05:35 AM 發表。
I did admit I made that grammer mistake, didn't you read my post ?
Have you solemn admit you made that grammer mistake??
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-29 05:35 AM 發表。
I said it dosen't really matter, but I did say I spelled one letter wrong
Also, correcting your error doesn't make me a hypocrite, or else all of your teacher would become a hypocrite
Plus, a teacher would make errors too...
Sure,correcting error doesn't make you a hypocrite
But you use "correcting error" to make your speciously excuse
Then you are a exactly hypocrite!!
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-30 02:27 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-29 08:18 PM 發表。
Then what is the post I posted at 2008-11-27
I'll show you what
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-27 05:30 AM 發表。
"We" dosen't mean "You"
In fact, "We" does not necessarily means anyone or everyone
It's based on the user's will, and you assume that I'm talking about you
You reply my post by saying:
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-27 07:25 PM 發表。
You are not afraid,you are scared,
If not,why don't you answer,and just said "I am not afraid to answer what you require me to"
Why you don't quote yesterday's new post and quote a post before three days
and said many and many excuse and undraw the talking-point again and again
It means you have nothing to say in reply
Which part did you reply my post?
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-29 08:18 PM 發表。
Then what is the post I posted at 2008-11-27
Have you solemn admit you made that grammer mistake??
Why do I need to admit solemnly?
Do you not understand what I said?
I have already admitted
You are the one with low understanding ability
I never asked you to admit solemnly
If you want me to admit solemnly, you should also admit solemnly too
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-29 08:18 PM 發表。
Then what is the post I posted at 2008-11-27
But you use "correcting error" to make your speciously excuse
How so, give specific example
I am only correcting it like how a teacher should do
Beside, I am also warning you indirectly that you shouldn't be using English for you are so bad at it
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-11-30 09:09 AM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-30 02:27 AM 發表。
Why do I need to admit solemnly?
Do you not understand what I said?
I have already admitted
You are the one with low understanding ability
I never asked you to admit solemnly
If you want me to admit solemnly, you should also admit solemnly too
Said like this according to you
We don't need to admit solemnly
Then how can you say I hadn't admitted???
What you depend on to say I hadn't admitted???
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-30 02:27 AM 發表。
How so, give specific example
I am only correcting it like how a teacher should do
Beside, I am also warning you indirectly that you shouldn't be using English for you are so bad at it
Are you a teacher??
You are not a teacher,how can you do the thing which is teacher should do??
You are not a cop, can you catch a offender,and lock the cuffsof him or her,even shot that offender if that offender resist???
what virtues or abilities have you????
However, you use "correcting error" to make your speciously excuse is an actual happening
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-11-30 11:18 PM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-30 09:09 AM 發表。
What you depend on to say I hadn't admitted???
If you said you had already admitted, then quote that sentence
If you can't, that means you still haven't admitted
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-11-30 09:09 AM 發表。
Are you a teacher??
Yes, I am
You still haven't reply the post I posted at 2008-11-27
Which means you are undrawing the talking point
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-1 08:45 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-30 11:18 PM 發表。
If you said you had already admitted, then quote that sentence
If you can't, that means you still haven't admitted
This the definition of admit is decide by you??
What qualification you have??
If you think I hadn't admited,that find the evidence
But this is your own business ,isn't concern with me
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-11-30 11:18 PM 發表。
Yes, I am
You still haven't reply the post I posted at 2008-11-27
That please show the photo of you teacher certificate to prove your status:em26:
It is your cheap trick for undrawing the talking point
I don't think I use to reply your cheap trick:em26::em26:
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-2 10:16 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-1 08:45 PM 發表。
If you think I hadn't admited,that find the evidence
But this is your own business ,isn't concern with me
Well, you're the person who came up with the idea for me to admit solemnly
If you think it's my own business, then you shouldn't be telling me to admit solemnly because it wasn't my business either.
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-1 08:45 PM 發表。
That please show the photo of you teacher certificate to prove your status
I am a part-time tutor
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-1 08:45 PM 發表。
It is your cheap trick for undrawing the talking point
I don't think I use to reply your cheap trick
It's no use bragging it
Give evidence
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-2 02:22 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-2 10:16 AM 發表。
Well, you're the person who came up with the idea for me to admit solemnly
If you think it's my own business, then you shouldn't be telling me to admit solemnly because it wasn't my busine ...
Yes!It is non of your business
Then why you intervene this??Intervene my own business???
Intervene it for 9 posts,from2008-11-22 05:15 AM until 2008-12-2 10:16 AM,for 10 days and 5 hour and 1 minute.
Then you said it isn't your business!!!
Are you play trickon me??
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-2 10:16 AM 發表。
I am a part-time tutor
You are not a certificated teacher,
Then please Shut Up!!!
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-3 05:40 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-2 02:22 PM 發表。
Are you play trickon me??
Yes because you are easily tricked
And it seems like you have a very unstable emotion
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-2 02:22 PM 發表。
You are not a certificated teacher,
Then please Shut Up!!!
I'm just trying to help.
If you don't appreciate it, I won't bother doing it
Actually, I wasn't helping you long time ago
It's just that you didn't realize
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-3 06:33 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-3 05:40 AM 發表。
Yes
because you are easily tricked
Am I easily to trick,I don't know
But I only know that you have a bad personality
Luckily you are not a certificated teacher,
If not,th world will be very woeful.
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-3 05:40 AM 發表。
I'm just trying to help.
If you don't appreciate it, I won't bother doing it
Actually, I wasn't helping you long time ago
It's just that you didn't realize
Did anyone ask for your help??
Smarty Kid
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-4 04:54 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-3 06:33 PM 發表。
But I only know that you have a bad personality
Luckily you are not a certificated teacher
This is also one of the reasons why I don't want to be a teacher who teaches in a proper school
Because I don't have to teach my student moral, but only knowledge
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-3 06:33 PM 發表。
Did anyone ask for your help??
Did you ask you mother to give birth to you before you were born?
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-4 06:20 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-4 04:54 AM 發表。
This is also one of the reasons why I don't want to be a teacher who teaches in a proper school
Because I don't have to teach my student moral, but only knowledge
Yes,you can't teach student moral how can you be a teacher??
Only knowledge no morals can't get a promising job
If you be a teacher and teach in a proper school
Then future society will get many danger
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-4 04:54 AM 發表。
Did you ask you mother to give birth to you before you were born?
This thing I use to ask my mother.
But in here,it is obvious to all,
no anyone in this post who had replied had asked for your help
Unless you had saw some mysterious things and he/she/it had asked for your help
Granted that mysterious things want help,also won't ask to a bad personality people
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-5 04:33 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-4 06:20 PM 發表。
Yes,you can't teach student moral how can you be a teacher??
Only knowledge no morals can't get a promising job
A tutor's job is to help the student with what they don't understand at school
And to get better marks at tests and exams
I don't see why I need to teach them moral
I'm not a philosophy teacher either
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-4 06:20 PM 發表。
no anyone in this post who had replied had asked for your help
No one in the world had asked their mother to give brith to them for they aren't even born
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-5 07:42 PM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-5 04:33 AM 發表。
A tutor's job is to help the student with what they don't understand at school
And to get better marks at tests and exams
I don't see why I need to teach them moral
I'm not a philosophy teacher either
You don't need to teach them moral
Because you can't teacher them moral
I think if you got a little bit moral,
you can find a teacher's job who teaches in a school
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-5 04:33 AM 發表。
No one in the world had asked their mother to give brith to them for they aren't even born
Remember
Has not had does not represent to do not have
You can't obviate one day got a breakthrough of scientific
People can pass through space-time and a silly guy go back to past and ask his mother to give brith to him
Can You Obviate??? Can You???????
You, too, can't negate people in future can pass through space-time
But
Granted that people can pass through space-time,he/she also use to reply the post to ask you for your without moral's help
Then,have or not???
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-8 06:19 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-5 07:42 PM 發表。
You don't need to teach them moral
Because you can't teacher them moral
I think if you got a little bit moral,
you can find a teacher's job who teaches in a school
Yes, so what?
I don't plan to teach in a school
And I have not even finished school yet
How can I teach in a proper school?
By the way, you have a more worse moral than me
You are the one who has bad temper and always humiliating me
I always use plain font and rarely uses funny face to humiliate you
What makes you the one who said I have no moral
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-5 07:42 PM 發表。
You can't obviate one day got a breakthrough of scientific
People can pass through space-time and a silly guy go back to past and ask his mother to give brith to him
Can You Obviate??? Can You???????
You, too, can't negate people in future can pass through space-time
OK, let's assume your theory is right
But that's not the talking point
The message is that I don't need your agreement before helping you
I have my freedom to express my opinion
However, you took my word literally and answered it without considering the figurative meaning
Which have drawn the talking point away
Or maybe you drew the talking point away purposely because you don't know how to answer
[ 本帖最後由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:21 AM 編輯 ]
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-8 10:51 AM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:19 AM 發表。
Yes, so what?
I don't plan to teach in a school
And I have not even finished school yet
So You Can't
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-2 02:22 PM 發表。
Then please Shut Up!!!
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:19 AM 發表。
You are the one who has bad temper and always humiliating me
What are you depend on and to sat I humiliate you???
Is "humiliate" is define by you???
You think you are humiliating me,but it is not equal to I am humiliating you
Let's ask for your teacher who teaches in a proper school's help
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:19 AM 發表。
I always use plain font and rarely uses funny face to humiliate you
Is use plain font and rarely uses funny face to humiliate is not humiliate???
whether you use what to humiliate,you are also humiliating!
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:19 AM 發表。
I have my freedom to express my opinion
Yes, you have freedom
But you should know that freedom have costand
The cost is
You use to undrew the talking point again and again
and
These humiliate which ask by your self:lol:lol:lol:lol
作者:
johnny19931993 時間: 2008-12-9 09:32 AM
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-8 10:51 AM 發表。
What are you depend on and to sat I humiliate you???
I don't quite understand the meaning of this sentence
How do I "sat" you humiliate me?
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-8 10:51 AM 發表。
Is "humiliate" is define by you???
No, but if my definition is not the same as yours, it doesn't mean my definition is wrong
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-8 10:51 AM 發表。
you are also humiliating
It's not define by you either
原帖由 新齡 於 2008-12-8 10:51 AM 發表。
You use to undrew the talking point again and again
How?
作者:
新齡 時間: 2008-12-9 10:07 AM
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-9 09:32 AM 發表。
don't quite understand the meaning of this sentence
How do I "sat" you humiliate me?
Then use your stupid brain to think it about
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-9 09:32 AM 發表。
No, but if my definition is not the same as yours, it doesn't mean my definition is wrong
Yes,it doesn't mean my definition is wrong
But also doesn't correct
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-9 09:32 AM 發表。
It's not define by you either
It's unconcerned with define
Because
You has already admit
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-8 06:19 AM 發表。
I always use plain font and rarely uses funny face to humiliate you
原帖由 johnny19931993 於 2008-12-9 09:32 AM 發表。
How?
How??
You better ask yourself
作者:
jason123 時間: 2008-12-14 01:03 PM 標題: 回答
有考證嗎????????
作者:
ken2008 時間: 2009-1-4 09:45 PM
埃及人真係好不可思議.....剩係個金字塔就可以同宇宙連上關係......
其他都好掂.......
作者:
`乜鬼. 時間: 2009-1-31 05:23 PM
第二幅好搞笑
作者:
jianhua201 時間: 2009-4-6 08:08 PM 標題: 回覆 #1 夢想幻滅 的帖子
單憑人類的說法很難解釋一切....很深奧
作者:
`乜鬼. 時間: 2009-4-8 08:53 PM
原帖由 `乜料 於 2008-11-23 04:42 PM 發表。
英文王決戰x_x
係
作者:
kirstybabyy 時間: 2010-4-14 05:33 PM
好想知結果
作者:
Matthew417 時間: 2010-7-6 07:56 AM
多謝分享 !! 
作者:
guibo123 時間: 2010-11-11 08:39 PM 標題: 回覆 #1 夢想幻滅 的帖子
外星人...
還是不太相信
作者:
qaz110643152 時間: 2011-5-21 09:51 AM
這些應該都是外星文明吧
| 歡迎光臨 YK Forum (http://eyankit.com/forum/) |
Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 |